Hear me out
April 18, 2008 on 10:00 am | In entertainment, rant | 2 CommentsOkay, you guys know that I’m totally not an activist in any sense of the word. Well, I never was anyway. But the older I get, the more I care about things in regards to politics, which can be bothersome because apathy is so much more convenient. But I strongly urge you guys to go to save the internet.com and click on “Tell Congress to Save the Internet” and to do so forthwith.
So here’s why. It’s all about keeping Net Neutrality. I’ll quote the site’s information because they’re better at saying it than me:
The consequences of a world without Net Neutrality would be devastating. Innovation would be stifled, competition limited, and access to information restricted. Consumer choice and the free market would be sacrificed to the interests of a few corporate executives.
On the Internet, consumers are in ultimate control — deciding between content, applications and services available anywhere, no matter who owns the network. There’s no middleman. But without Net Neutrality, the Internet will look more like cable TV. Network owners will decide which channels, content and applications are available; consumers will have to choose from their menu.
The free and open Internet brings with it the revolutionary possibility that any Internet site could have the reach of a TV or radio station. The loss of Net Neutrality would end this unparalleled opportunity for freedom of expression.
The Internet has always been driven by innovation. Web sites and services succeeded or failed on their own merit. Without Net Neutrality, decisions now made collectively by millions of users will be made in corporate boardrooms. The choice we face now is whether we can choose the content and services we want, or whether the broadband barons will choose for us.
Okay, I realize that that was long, but still. I’ll summarize it for you. Net neutrality = good. Big companies making it so that if you pay a lot, you keep getting fast service (that you’re used to) and you can go to the sites that you’ve always been able to go to, and if you pay less, your service will be slow and you will be limited as to what sites you can visit = bad. It would mean taking away the freedom that we presently have online. So go to go to save the internet.com. Do something.
Trivial vs. News
April 4, 2008 on 1:06 pm | In rant | 3 CommentsSo I’m taking a Survey of Broadcast Media, and of course, I hear a lot about how Americans only want to hear about entertainment news. We’d rather hear about Britney Spears flashing her nether regions than the people dying in the war in Iraq. And when it comes to “real news,” anything that isn’t sensational gets pushed back to the end of the news segment.
Of course, all of that is true. The news gives us what we want. But why do we want that? Why don’t we want to hear about the important issues rather than the superficial? I’d argue that it’s part of self-preservation, at least psychologically. No one wants to think about things that are tragic and unfair in the world when there’s nothing they can do about it. It’s mentally taxing. Plus, if we want to see gore and hear about atrocities, we can always watch a violent movie and then brush it off because it isn’t real. With the news, not so much.
For instance. The other night in class we learned about this story that got pushed to the back of the nightly news so that most people were asleep when it came on. The story was about how some of the hospitals that America has built in Iraq aren’t finished; the sewage is all messed up, they can’t afford to power the hospitals, they only have one oxygen machine for the NICU so that babies have to share–that’s right–take turns getting oxygen. Oh! And this nice truck that America donated to them, which has an American flag and “from the American people” written on the side, and has new wheels and a new coat of paint (they were told it was new), is actually over 60 years old. They had to crank the thing up. So the claim that we’re over there spreading democracy and trying to help seems all the more like an unconvincing facade; we only want to look like we’re over there for a noble cause. But here’s the thing. There’s nothing I can do about that. I don’t have the money or the equipment to help finish the hospitals. And all it does is make me sad and annoyed. Yeah, I can “do my part” by voting, and I will, don’t get me wrong, but it doesn’t feel like enough.
So yeah, I do prefer to hear about trivial things. I haven’t gotten to a point where I don’t watch or read the news (I have CNN, BBC, and Yahoo news on my RSS feed), but I’m getting close.
Birthday Wishes from the DMV
October 8, 2007 on 10:49 am | In rant | 3 CommentsSo here in the peachy state of Georgia, vehicle registration fees are due on your birthday. And since both of our cars have my name as the owner, it’s double the fun!
Isn’t that the most lame thing ever? You have a little money to spend on yourself for your birthday, and the DMV goes ahead and takes it away. It reminds me of that scene in Disney’s Robin Hood where the honorable sheriff of Nottingham takes away Skippy’s (the bunny’s) birthday farthing for taxes. Greedy DMV.
Recycle or else
October 4, 2007 on 12:47 pm | In weather, rant | 1 CommentSo another warm winter has been predicted by our friendly weather predictors. I know many people disagree over whether global warming is caused by humans, sun activity, or God’s wrath, but let’s be practical here. If it is human-caused, I am going to get you people who don’t recycle and who drive Hummers. No seriously, you may enjoy your big giant gas guzzling luxuries, but me and my economy car are not amused. I hate hate hate warm weather. What’s the point of living in Atlanta if you don’t get a real winter? Well? I suffer through the torture that is the summer of Hot-lanta GA, and I expect to be repaid in full when winter comes.
If I don’t get to use my fireplace this winter, I’m totally going to join the tree huggers. And then won’t you feel guilty?
The Varsity
October 2, 2007 on 9:52 am | In rant, school, food | 3 CommentsSo I’m taking a Persuasive Writing class. Turns out, it’s quite similar to blogging. So I figured I’d post one of my first papers, a review of a fastfood restaurant.
Smashed Burgers and Clogged Arteries
What’ll ya have? I stood transfixed, struggling to pick out a menu item as the lady behind the cash register’s patience seemed to be spent. So this was the Varsity (or The Varsity Jr. anyway). Already I had growing doubts about the restaurant, but I tried to silence them by telling myself to give the place a chance. A burger. I could order a burger. I piped up, “I’ll have a cheeseburger and…” She pressed a button and looked back up at me. “Um, some fries and a coke.” She rang it up and told me the total. Hmm, a bit pricey. I stepped aside and waited for my food. When the items were all piled on the red tray, I surveyed the victuals. It didn’t look good. It looked greasy. It didn’t look all that fresh. And I could tell my arteries were soon going to be crying out in agony. But I was determined. Continue reading The Varsity…
Of course it’s hot in hot-lanta
August 7, 2007 on 8:43 am | In weather, rant | 3 CommentsBut seriously, this is just ridiculous. The high is in the upper nineties and the air is thick with humidity and utter discomfort. You can’t stay outside for more than five minutes without getting a sweat stache. And just try feeling remotely attractive with a sweat stache. My car heats up to about 300 degrees during the day, so when I get in I can’t even touch the steering wheel and God help me if I touch the metal on the seatbelt.
Whenever I talk to friends back in southern California during the winter, and they boast that it’s 75 degrees when it’s 40 degrees in Atlanta, I actually don’t envy them. I like cold weather because I like sweaters and hot chocolate and whatnot. But when they brag that it’s 75 degrees there when it’s a bajillion degrees here (or 100, but what’s the difference?), I struggle to remember exactly why we moved. Back in SoCal, we used our air conditioner about three times a year. You can’t survive here without air conditioning. You’d have a heat stroke, or in the least suffer from exhaustion since it’s impossible to sleep when it’s hot.
Our apartment heats up like crazy, and I’m not really sure what to do to conserve energy, because I refuse to allow the thermostat to go over 80. Our apartment is on the third floor, we have vaulted ceilings, and the sun shines pretty strongly on parts of our apartment. But we have trees blocking out some of the sun, and blinds and curtains, but it doesn’t seem to help. I’m hoping that we’ll be able to go without air conditioning or heating in the Fall months, which are usually pretty temperate, to make up for our soaring electric bill during the Summer.
Wow, this was a mundane post. Maybe next time I’ll talk about something interesting, like my cat. You guys like that, right?
In which I argue with songs
June 27, 2007 on 9:47 am | In rant | 3 CommentsI’m going to cross the ideas behind my advice to bands from 20 years ago blog and my arguing with signs blog, thereby making an arguing with songs blog. Sort of like this one where I made it clear that “catch my disease” is not an attractive request.
The song of topic today is “If Everyone Cared” by Nickelback. I’ve heard this song on the radio a few times. For a while I wasn’t sure which grungy Creed-like band did this song - not that it really matters. It all blends together anyway in the mediocre pool of songs that “best hits” radio stations rotate without thought or passion. Anyway. Anyone who has been unlucky enough to be in the car with me when this song graced the radio waves has already heard this rant, because I just can’t hold this rant in if I listen to more than a minute of the song (in the incidence that I forget my iPod and all the other stations, including the mariachi stations, are playing commercials).
Let’s get to it then.
I get the idea. If everyone cared, shared, loved, stopped lying, and ingested their pride, no one would die, right? Because there would be no murder, no negligence, no suicide, no reason to cry. That’s a lovely idea.If everyone cared and nobody cried
If everyone loved and nobody lied
If everyone shared and swallowed their pride
Then we’d see the day when nobody died
But it’s WRONG. It’s completely unrealistic. People will die. No, really. And it’s good. Overcrowding the earth? Not good. We’d have all kinds of diseases, lack of food, not enough room. Plus, sometimes people are just ready to die. They’re old, in pain, ready to go. And I don’t think they’d take kindly to people who are holding them back by caring and not lying. Which is why they would probably give them a good whack with their cane, thereby causing death to reenter the earth’s realm because of all the crying and stuff.
Perhaps the song could be altered to say, “we’d see the day when nobody died prematurely or needlessly.” I’d give them that. But to claim that goodness will make death go away? That’s just crazy talk put to music.
A Website after my own heart
June 26, 2007 on 10:24 am | In rant | 1 CommentI hate cilantro. I love www.ihatecilantro.com. Cilantro: the most offensive food known to man.
Just this weekend I ordered chicken from a Mexican restaurant, and it arrived covered in cilantro. It was so perfect before, though. Grilled chicken, a thin layer of cooked spinach, avocados, mushrooms, and a layer of cheese. And then they scattered a heap of cilantro on top. Bleh. I meticulously removed most of the offending herb, but every once in a while I’d bite into the vile plant and my tastebuds would be assaulted by the unmistakable aftertaste.
The anti-cilantro site even has a chart showing what the members think cilantro tastes like. I’ve never eaten a stink bug, but I imagine it would taste like cilantro. I bet restaurants wouldn’t scatter stink bugs on Mexican dishes. Why cilantro? Death to cilantro!
I’ll end with a haiku from the site.
Freedom haters wail:
“Cilantro! More cilantro!”
The terrorists win.
You’ll Understand When You Have Kids
April 9, 2007 on 10:29 am | In rant | 16 CommentsI hear this fairly often when I’m around people from my church, because as I mentioned in a post a few months ago, there is a baby-making epidemic going on (every woman has a baby on their hip or a bump on their belly). Which is great, I’m not against children and I think procreating is wonderful and children are a blessing and soforth.
Often when people say “you’ll understand when you have kids,” it just seems patronizing:
“You enjoy sleeping in while you can. When you have kids, you’ll be up at 7 am every day.”
“Just wait til you have kids - you won’t be going to restaurants for a long time!”
“When you have kids, everything will suck but it will be so worth it.”
Okay, that last one wasn’t real. But you get the point.
Here’s a pet peeve of mine, though. The way that some parents act like you know NOTHING of empathy, love, and sacrifice until you have children. I’m sure that having a baby changes so much of who you are - your life completely changes forever, you love that child more than you ever imagined possible, you would do anything for that child, etc. And I’m sure it’s true. But don’t invalidate the experiences of those who don’t have children.
Here’s an example. We were with a group, and we were talking about this particularly heartbreaking incident where a father was in a serious accident and his children witnessed it. One person said, “You guys who don’t have children have no idea how painful it would be to know your children had to go through that, that they had to experience that sort of trauma, to not be able to protect them from that.”
That was like a punch in the gut for me. We know loss. And I wondered if the person who said that ever considered the possibility that we had experienced something similar from the other side of the situation.
Yeah, I’m sure we’ll learn so much when we do have kids. I’m sure I’ll be calling my mom and apologizing for everything I ever said to her from ages 12 to 18. I’m sure we’ll be blown away by the whole parenting experience. But our experiences, our times of joy and sadness, our understanding of sacrifice and unchanging love - that’s all still very valid.
“The South has the sniffles from pollen.”
March 28, 2007 on 8:38 am | In weather, rant | 4 CommentsThis article on Yahoo! news is cute. The sniffles. That’s the best they’ve got?
Atlanta’s pollen count hit 5,499 particles per cubic meter of air Monday, the highest so far this season and the fourth highest in the 12 years that the Atlanta Allergy and Asthma Clinic has been keeping records… A reading of 120 is considered extremely high in the Southeast.
That’s serious pollen. That’s not “sniffles” pollen. That’s sinus headache, violent sneezing, watery eyes pollen. I haven’t worn my contacts or eye makeup all week because neither go well with crusty eyes.
On the bright side, bees are enjoying this weather, right? They best be. I’m expecting them to crank out some serious honey this year. Happy spring, everyone!