On Friday night we had just finished eating dinner and were in the parking lot of Outback Steakhouse when Brandon suggested we go to Blockbuster to rent a movie.
"No, I refuse."
"Why? It'll be fun."
"It will not be fun! You will hold me hostage in there for hours while you peruse every single used movie until you find one - ONE - that you want to buy, and then insist on finding two more because it's 3 for $25. And then we'll end up with one good movie, and two movies that I'm ashamed to own."
"That won't happen."
"Yes it will! How else do you explain the fact that we own Mr. Deeds?"
"This time will be different."
He did slightly trick me this time. I forgot the trick he always used to use, the "I don't have a blockbuster membership" trick that works because it seems easier to just buy rather than join. This time there was a 2 for $20 deal, and we were able to find two movies that we both wanted to see;
Capote and
Good Night, and Good Luck. We watched Capote that night, and haven't gotten around to Good Night, and Good Luck.
*Possible spoiler ahead.*
*Definite disclaimer ahead.*
I don't claim to be great at analyzing movies or reviewing them, so I realize that what I say below has probably already been said, and been said far better. But that obviously isn't going to stop me.
I was talking about the movie Capote with a friend (hi, Eric!) who had seen it. He didn't like it because he couldn't understand how Truman Capote could sympathize so much with murderers who had committed such a heinous crime.
Why would someone help these people? Why would Capote get so close to Perry Smith? Why would he help them by getting them a lawyer and getting their death sentence pushed back?
It was obvious that Capote wanted to get more information out of them to write his book (
In Cold Blood). And really, there have probably been very few murder cases where people have had the opportunity Capote had to analyze each standpoint, dig into the details, understand motives and get up close and personal with the case. But also, I could understand him sympathizing with Smith because they had similar childhoods, being passed around either by family members or foster homes and never feeling very loved. Of Smith, Capote said, "It's as if Perry and I grew up in the same house. And one day he stood up and went out the back door, while I went out the front."
I've always found murder stories to be intriguing. It's interesting to analyze people who have crossed the line of normal human behaviour. What happened? Did they build up to it after slowly being desensitized? Is it that they were neglected as children and never learned to love, sympathize, discern right from wrong? And because of lawyers and simply the justice system, it's not terribly common for people to have such a clear view of the whole scope of an incident like
the murder of the Clutter family.
"Two worlds exist in this country: the quiet conservative life, and and the life of those two men - the underbelly, the criminally violent. Those two worlds converged that bloody night."
It's easy to understand the intrigue of the case, harder to understand any sympathy one might feel for the killers. I guess that's why the movie is so interesting.