
Yes, that's right. The authorship of Hebrews should no longer be called into question because the 1769 edition of King James Version published by Cambridge University Press says that Paul the Apostle wrote the Epistle to the Hebrews. All the endless discussions in the scholarly community should be placed aside because it was not Clement of Rome, Barnabas, Luke, Philip, Priscilla, Jude, Silvanus, nor Apollos. It was Paulthe Cambridge Bible says so at the beginning of the letter.
But wait. At the end of the epistle the colophon says something quite different. The author of Hebrews was not Paul, but Timothy. You would think that the publishers would (1) not be so dogmatic as to ascribe the authorship to a person without explanation, and (2) not have conflicting views in the very same book. Was it Paul? Or was it Timothy? Or did Paul preach it and Timothy was the amanuensis? Who knows. I just thought it was funny how the Cambridge bible contradicts itself here.

